Address:  Many Paths: One Faith (an Intro to UU)©

The Rev. Sarah Lammert, USR, August 26, 2007

 

 

            Todd makes his living in agriculture.  He is the owner and general manager of a company that propagates native plant species, growing several million plants a year for use in environmental restoration.  He also is a lifelong social activist who has turned his passion for human rights into a remarkable record of service and advocacy.

            Lee lives in an apartment with my two cats in a friendly, self-managed co-op in Sunset Park.  She works at a child welfare agency in Brooklyn, implementing and improving foster care and adoption policy and practice.  She is also engaged in anti-racism work. 

            Jane is an estate lawyer.  She lives in Salt Lake City with her partner Tami, where the two of them support many efforts to improve the rights and quality of life for gays and lesbians – and especially gay teens who are often isolated in the conservative climate in Utah. 

            Bruce works at a highly secured federal military facility.  He also maintains extensive gardens at his home, and enjoys spending time with his wife at home and on frequent wilderness trips.  He is a thinking person -- a spiritual and philosophical explorer.

            Todd, Lee, Jan, and Bruce come from different religious backgrounds, have different interests, commitments and ideas about life.  What they all share is their passion for Unitarian Universalism.  All have been active in their local congregations, and even beyond that have served at the district level and beyond.  These four people have found in this free faith a place to bring their whole selves – their dreams, shortcomings, questions and hopes – and experience a community that is united not by creed or dogma, but by a shared commitment to living a life that grows ever greater in generosity of spirit, that is open to spiritual and intellectual challenge, and that holds a vision of justice for our world. 

            It may surprise some of you to learn that in our earliest institutional form, UU’s were actually the inheritors of the Puritan Order.  Vision’s of Hawthorne’s “Scarlet Letter” and his suffering Hester Prynne notwithstanding, it is from the Puritans that we have our congregational polity, our acceptance of reason in the interpretation of religious scripture, and the idea of social responsibility as intrinsic to religious life.[1]  Many of our meetinghouses in Massachusetts, including the oldest continually occupied church building in our nation (“Old Ship” Church in Hingham, Massachusetts) were originally Puritan congregations which became influenced in the early nineteenth century by liberal religious ideas calling for more openness, more tolerance, and an emphasis on free will and the potential goodness of humanity over the rather more fatalistic and pessimistic view of humanity espoused by the more conservative, Calvinist wing of Christianity. 

            It was the Reformer Calvin, you may remember, who claimed the total depravity of humanity, and who inspired Great Awakening  of the 18th century – the original revival movement in this country that whipped people into a frenzy of despair, fainting and screaming over the images of hellfire and damnation in sermons by Jonathon Edwards and others.  Just to give you a tiny taste of this experience, here is an excerpt from Edward’s most famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God:”

The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked: his wrath towards you burns like fire; he looks upon you as worthy of nothing else, but to be cast into the fire; he is of purer eyes than to bear to have you in his sight; you are ten thousand times more abominable in his eyes, than the most hateful venomous serpent is in ours.

            It would be early 19th century Unitarian clergy such as William Ellery Channing who would articulate a more affirming theology as regards humanity – lifting up the best that human beings can strive for in the arts, in science, and in pursuit of the common good.  What was then known as the “Boston Religion” became the dominate force in the political, commercial and cultural leadership of this important city up until the Civil War, when so much of the social landscape of our nation changed. 

            Alongside of the Unitarian influence among the elite of Boston and the surrounding towns of Eastern Massachusetts, were the Universalists – a separate sect of Christianity that embraced the idea of universal salvation.  The Universalists presented a vision of a loving God who forgives all sins.  Like the Unitarians, they rejected the idea of eternal hell, not because humans were so good, but because God was so loving.  As the famous 19th century Unitarian minister, The Rev. Thomas Starr King once quipped:  The only difference between the Unitarians and the Universalists is this: The one thinks they are too good to be damned and the other thinks God is too good to damn them!

            [As an aside, the statue of Thomas Starr King which once stood in the California State Assembly was recently removed to make room for a statue of Ronald Reagan.  The real Thomas Starr King might have put up a good fight about that.  When questioned by his new congregation in San Francisco about his small stature and youthful appearance, he said “I may weigh only 120 pounds, but when I’m mad I weigh a ton!”  This kind of zeal helped King to convince the state of California not to secede during the Civil War, and later raised over a million Civil War era dollars to help support the US Sanitation Commission, the forerunner of the Red Cross in response to the humanitarian crisis suffered by Union soldiers, who died far more often of disease than from battle wounds inflicted by Confederate bullets.  King also worked on flood and drought relief, and for the rights of San Francisco’s African-American and Chinese laborers.  Meanwhile, he grew his own congregation fivefold and brought the church out of near bankruptcy.  All of this was accomplished in a mere four years and it took a toll – unfortunately Thomas Starr King fell prey to diphtheria and pneumonia and died at only 42 years of age.]

            Starr King’s is but one of many such heroic and outstanding tales of our Unitarian and Universalist forbears, who include such notables as John & Abigail Adams, Louisa May Alcott, PT Barnum, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ee cummings, Charles Dickens, Julia Ward Howe, Horace Mann, Maria Mitchell, Sylvia Plath, Beatrix Potter, and more recently such eclectic personalities as Rod Serling, Christopher Reeve, Ysaye Barnwell and Linus Pauling. 

            Unitarians and Universalists had different constituencies and styles: the one dominated by upper class intellectuals from New England, and the other representing a more grass roots movement spreading its good news of Divine Love among farmers and laborers in the tiny towns of the East and Midwest.  What they had it common with us today is this:  they weren’t afraid to question the dominant religious beliefs of their times, and they weren’t afraid to change as their questions evolved. 

Throughout the centuries, their circles of inclusion grew wider and wider, and by 1961 for a variety of reasons it made sense for the two denominations to merge.  And so you have, in the briefest form, the story that brings us to be called Unitarian Universalists today.

            “But want do the Unitarian Universalists believe?!” wonders the bewildered visitor who may feel like this is the right place, while not sure exactly why.  A look through the upcoming activities in the order of service doesn’t exactly help to shed light on the question.  On Mondays the Zen group is meeting, while on Tuesday there is a lecture on humanism and democracy.  Wednesday is the adult pagan spirituality class and Thursday is the Bible study class for skeptics.  Friday there is an AA meeting in the back room and a wine tasting in the front room.  Saturday is the vegan biker club, and a few Sundays from now there is a service celebrating the Jewish High Holy Days. 

            Unitarian Universalists are in sympathy with the George Burns version of the divine (if we are in sympathy with any depiction of the divine) in the movie “Oh God.”  In it, God is asked by John Denver whether Jesus was indeed his son.  “Of course he was my son,” George answers, taking a drag on his cigar, “So were Confucius, the Buddha, Mohammed…”  And, I would add Inanna, Athena, Hillel, Martin Luther Kings Jr, Sojourner Truth, you, and me. 

            As Unitarian Universalists we believe that the “truth” has many sources, and is more a process than a frozen system of belief captured in revelation by any one person or scripture.  Ours is a living faith – one that invites us to be free and authentic with our doubts and our certainties as we strive for greater understanding.  The hardest part of being a Unitarian Universalist is living in the tension of uncertainty about the nature of life and death from time to time, as we remain open to being changed by our experiences and by the wisdom of others.  The best part, as far as I’m concerned, is that each one of us is not only given permission to ask hard questions, but to live those questions – life as an adventure that unfolds rather than a rule book to be followed. 

            Unitarian Universalism is a young faith by world religion standards, and we are challenged sometimes by the very thing that gives us our strength – and that is our diversity.  We quibble over religious language, and we sometimes reject the particularity of other’s ways of expressing themselves even while proclaiming that we embrace all views.  As my colleague John Buehrens stated when he was the President of the UUA: “We are constantly being challenged to become more inclusive, mature and enduring in our love.”

            Looking ahead, it remains to be seen whether we will be written into the annals of history as a transformative religious movement that became a true force in a rapidly changing 21st century world, or whether we withered away after being a minor albeit feisty footnote in the history of religion. 

            Some of you are aware that I recently was elected the Vice President of the UU Minister’s Association, a job that looks to be substantial and worthy.  My partner-in-crime in this work, the Rev. Rob Eller-Isaacs, who has taken on the much harder job of being President this year, presented two visions of the purpose of liberal religion in a sermon that he presented in June for the General Assembly.  In the first vision, "the church is in the world to foster pluralism or enable dialog or even encourage community" while in the second "the church is in the world to engender the experience of the Holy in order to awaken compassion and foster a life of loving service."  Rev. Eller-Isaacs argued for the Holy and the life of loving service.   "Pluralism is a way to be together in community, not the purpose for which we come together."

            We are a people of covenant and not of creed, and so the way we are in community together is of crucial importance. 

It is fair to say that Unitarian Universalism is a life-affirming faith that says more about how one lives in this life than what we might expect in a life to come.  And yet; to define what it means to covenant with one another in love and acceptance is not adequate in terms of defining our purpose – Rob has it right there.  You may wish to argue with his overtly theistic language – indeed he intends to be provocative.  Let me read his phrase again for you so you can adequately argue with it – or embrace it!  “The church is in the world to engender the experience of the Holy in order to awaken compassion and foster a life of loving service."  Another way to say this might be that Unitarian Universalism is in the world to be generative – to awaken us to the glorious mystery that is life and inspire us to act for justice, in the service of love.

 

            I end today with a parable from the Sufi tradition:

Mulla Nasrudin decided to start a flower garden.  He prepared the soil and planted the seeds of many beautiful flowers.  But when they came up, his garden was filled not just with his chosen flowers but also overrun by dandelions.  He sought out advice from gardeners all over and tried every method to get rid of them but to no avail.  Finally he walked all the way to the capital to speak to the royal gardener at the sheik’s palace.  The wise old man had counseled many gardeners before and suggested a variety of ways to expel the dandelions, but the Mullah had tried them all.  They sat together in silence for some time and finally the gardener looked at Nasrudin and said, “Well, then I suggest you learn to love them.” 

            In Unitarian Universalism, we have traditionally embraced this affirmation of community in many of our congregations:  “Love is the spirit of this society and service its law.  This is our great covenant: to dwell together in peace, to seek the Truth in love, and to help one another.”  May we continue to embrace this difficult but rewarding path of embracing many beliefs while affirming one faith – a faith that sustains and transforms each once of us, as we then work to sustain and transform our world.

            Welcome Todd, Lee, Jane, Bruce, Maria, Pierre, Gunther and Ahmet.  Welcome dandelions, welcome tulips and wildflowers.  Welcome to all who would search for truth in love, and dwell together in peace.

 

Amen.  May it be so.



[1] For detailed information on the connections between Puritanism and Unitarianism see Richardson, Peter Tufts, Exploring Unitarian Universalist Identity,  Red Barn Publishing, Rockland ME, 2006.